Children and Screen Time Free Essays

Randi Getzelman English 151 03/24/2013 Every parent needs nothing increasingly then their youngster to succeed. They need their youngster to create and learn with out battle. In this day in age we approach such huge numbers of gadgets that can help add to a child’s achievement. We will compose a custom article test on Kids and Screen Time or on the other hand any comparable subject just for you Request Now Many will contend that a gadget, for example, an I-cushion or cell phone will impede ones learning. I feel the specific inverse will happen, and the youngster will pick up information. Kids create and adapt such a great amount at an extremely youthful age. They ingest all that they see and hear. They best learn through touch, sight, and sound. Utilizing a gadget, for example, a touch I-cushion, or I-telephone a youngster can collaborate on their level. There are such a significant number of Apps accessible for offspring everything being equal. They will enable a youngster to create at their capacity and speed, while learning. I feel they will assimilate more information with an instructive hands on gadget rather then TV. Kids need to associate and think carefully all together for the App to work. Putting a kid before a TV to simply sit and learn, they don't get similar hands on understanding. There will be those contending that setting a telephone or tablet in a child’s arms will cause hurt. I don't see that being valid, in this day in age we use App’s for everything. Or maybe at the market, banking, or even schools, most instruct with contact gadgets. I feel that helping your youngster learn with a hands free gadget, will just assistance them later on. Step by step instructions to refer to Children and Screen Time, Essay models

Exam question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Test question - Essay Example Remedial equity is less corrective than the customary equity framework which requires the guilty party to endure a fine or imprisonment. Remedial equity centers around the requirements of the person in question and the more extensive network. Rather than being rebuffed alone, remedial equity centers around getting the guilty party to assume liability for his activities. In doing this, the casualty may need to concede his blame and take activities to either apologize to the person in question or restore the casualty in lieu of the considerable number of misfortunes endured. In different cases, the guilty party experiences network administration. The thought process of remedial equity is to concentrate on the individual needs of the person in question. Expressed in an unexpected way, the methodology of sending guilty parties to prison and getting them to pay fines to the state doesn't appear to give direct fulfillment to the people in question. This is on the grounds that it appears to be indifferent and the casualty doesn't get any sort of compensation or reparation. Be that as it may, on account of helpful equity, the casualty persuades the chance to be given what s/he lost in an offense. In the event that it is unimaginable to expect to give back, the wrongdoer may render a conciliatory sentiment and vow not to do so once more. This cultivates shared relations and advances renewal (b) What are the points of Restorative Justice? The Crown Prosecution Service plots three principle points of helpful equity. The principal point is to advance casualty fulfillment. At the end of the day, there is proof that the customary methodology of condemning offenses and detaining guilty parties doesn't appear to fulfill casualties. Or maybe, it just fend the guilty parties off and there is no contact among them and casualties. Therapeutic equity gives an arrangement of diminishing trepidation and pressures between the person in question and the culprit. Likewise, as it were, t he statement of regret of the person in question and remuneration [which isn't a component of customary courts] can fulfill a casualty inwardly. In another sense, the pay or compensation paid by a casualty can end up being useful in helping casualties to return to their previous position. The second point of helpful equity is to cultivate some type of commitment between the person in question and culprit. The thought is to give a significant stage through which the casualty can mention to the culprit what he things. Likewise, the culprit can acknowledge his blame, and apologize as far as concerns him in the circumstance. The casualty gets mindful of his activities and the outcomes. Through, this he willfully acknowledges the commitment to accomplish something for the person in question and network so as to present appropriate reparations. This makes the entire procedure of discipline progressively close to home and helpful. The third point of remedial equity is that it makes network capital. As it were, it empowers the network to get a success win criminal equity framework in which individuals are rebuffed sufficiently and proportionately. Likewise, guilty parties are made mindful of the extent of their activities and this keeps them from reoffending. In this sense, the network manufactures some level of trust in the equity framework and makes them fell more made sure about and secured by the law. 2. (a) What are the focal points and disservices of Restorative Justice (assessing the assortment of ‘stakeholders’ who are, or may be, influenced by it)? There are a few focal points of helpful equity. Above all else, remedial equity improves the result of court's choice in light of the fact that the casualties find the opportunity to

The world around me free essay sample

Inside this forlorn room I am glancing out the window, looking for the consideration of this lethargic world. I am truly astounded of how Television can be so interesting. Sitting on the eating table, I watched out off guard these small children playing in the downpour at that point contemplated internally, I grew up something over the top. Playing soccer in the house is the thing that I live for and consistently do. Without anyone else spilling the ball forward and in reverse, there and back, its the most astounding approach to kill time and to utilize your creative mind to play. Floating left and right, I got myself, shouting with torment since I Just hit the side of a divider with my pinky. I tumbled to the ground chuckling and crying with torment. On the dividers of my home are these uncommon banners around portraying who my family truly implied and was about. As I admired the daylight in the sky, I nearly gone visually impaired, yet the mists spared me covering the sun and taking cover behind this cool conceptual, searching wherever for the moon. We will compose a custom exposition test on My general surroundings or on the other hand any comparable subject explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page I ended up looking extremely hard the finally I discovered it taking cover behind the trees close to my home. I contemplated internally that IVe discovered multi day stars, the sun and the moon, at that point I grinned. I saw the moon ascending from the skyline as day fell and night came. Taking a gander at the moon, I wanted to go up to the moon to be as free and the prompt riser in the sky. At that point as day came I woke up taking a gander at the outside the window. I saw the sun, sparkling its beams onto the fresh leaves of fall, making the leaves look progressively orange and appealing that it previously was. On the other hand taking a gander at the wonderful planets of the night, I had the option to spot Saturn, I saw numerous stars, and wasnt ready to remembered it so I guaranteed myself that I would catch up on cosmology the next year. I consistently cant quit pondering stars, so I follow the new on stars and how the U. S looks for any Methane/life shapes on other close by planets.

Sociology and Modernity

Advancement is one expression that is intricate to characterize. This is on the grounds that no exact meaning of advancement that is all inclusive acknowledged has been chosen. This is comprehensive of the humanism field that has seen such a significant number of hypotheses realized to characterize advancement. In any case, we can have a general definition characterizing innovation as a post-middle age period that is perceivable with an exceptional change from the pre-current idea of agrarianism to a universe of industrialization, free enterprise, urbanization, defense and general social change that was colossally received by the whole world, however having its root beginnings in Europe in the occasions around 1700. Renaissance was the prompt time that went before advancement; renaissance for this situation alluding to the last snapshots of the moderately aged time. This time was about logical and mechanical upset that saw the ascent of numerous creations that have come to characterize the innovation of modernization. The social change can be credited to the illumination of mankind as Immanuel Kant expressed in one of his celebrated books. Numerous definitions have been in this way raised in the field of human science and by various savants. Karl Marx characterizes advancement as an industrialist transformation. Free enterprise is a condition of financial status that depends on independence in that an individual puts resources into various proprietorships or organizations for the sole reason for individual advantages or revenue driven thought process. He consequently considers innovation to be a malicious marvel and truly scrutinizes it. Then again, Max Weber characterizes innovation based on close to home convictions that in the long run lead to the social changes that happen in modernization. He considers advancement to be a pattern that prompts the decrease in conventional qualities and amplifies justification that he so much feelings of dread would in the end erode off humankind. He is so cynical on the impacts of innovation given the mean definition that he provides for the marvel. The remainder of the thinkers to give a definition in our paper will be Emile Durkheim. Durkheim at any rate had an idealistic meaning of advancement, however not so much hopeful. He characterized advancement based on work division. He accepted that innovation would get the world the idea of broadening of monetary exercises in the human culture. He considered modernization to be a move of progress in the manner the network worked; the solidarity change from mechanical to natural. On the cynical side, he anyway fears anomie, an express that depicts insignificant good direction gave to people in the general public (Calhoun, Gerteis, and Moody 46). As characterized in the initial part, advancement conveys along various social changes and social qualities that characterize an obvious contrast from similar components that were knowledgeable about the pre-current age. Advancement has significantly influenced the premise of the family on the planet today. The family as an establishment, combined with numerous different things like marriage, ethical quality and religion have all been undermined. In the pre-present day age, the ethical quality of the general public originated from the family organization. Accordingly, the circumspection that was constantly associated with the childhood of an ethical family was the main need by the family heads around then (Macionis 4). Legislative issues has experienced powerful change because of the impact advancement. In the pre-current days, legislative issues was not as dominative for what it's worth in the cutting edge world. Advancement has made governments have a dominative hand by intensely directing its residents by complicated and uncongenial bureaucratic arrangement. The economy is another substance that has characterized innovation. In the pre-present day time, economy was characterized by agrarian profitability. This can even be exhibited by the Feudalist arrangement of government that existed in Europe. This arrangement of a political framework included land being traded thus for administrations. It was where the rulers, who were the land proprietors, gave out land to vassals, who were the occupants. The land in this sort of political framework was alluded to as fief. In any case, the economy in the advanced society has totally taken a wind, with private enterprise being the framework. Free enterprise fixated on the individual interests and benefits intention of either an individual or a nation. This implies no levelheaded prioritization will be taken if at all a nation or an individual has the point of making benefit. This is a framework that was broadly censured by rationalists, for example, Karl Marx (Calhoun, Gerteis, Moody, Pfaff, and Virk 122). The various thinkers who thought of the different meanings of advancement had shifted desires and forecasts that would go along innovation. Karl Marx had a critical perspective on advancement. He exceptionally reprimanded free enterprise, an economy framework that he guaranteed set in with advancement. He considers private enterprise to be a benefit roused framework and in this way a narrow minded framework. He additionally dreaded the ascent of classes in the general public, something that he portrays as the infant of free enterprise. He detestably censures private enterprise as covetousness and personal responsibility and had skeptical desires for the advanced world. He predicts difficulties, for example, outrageous destitution while different nations swam in a great deal of riches, all with the coming of an industrialist economy. Max Weber, with his meaning of innovation being founded on human reasonability, had his feelings of trepidation on the corruption of mankind. Weber was likewise negative in transit advancement would change the world. He predicted the distance of social equity that would set in because of the adjustment in people convictions achieved by advancement (Calhoun et al 122). Among these three scholars, Emile Durkheim in any event had a hopeful perspective on the setting in of innovation. With his meaning of innovation being founded on the division of work, he saw advancement acquiring uncommon development of the economy. This would happen because of work expansion and specialization that would similarly disseminate human asset to each monetary movement. His desires for the appearance of innovation were consequently high. Regardless of him having these uplifting desires, he had a dread of anomie. This is where there is moderate debasement of ethics in the general public because of dismissal of good direction by human who might have every one of their psyches set towards the advancement of the economy. The subject of advancement has constantly raised a great deal of contentions. Numerous thinkers have raised speculations attempting to characterize innovation yet no articular hypothesis has been internationally acknowledged to characterize advancement. With this paper however, we have had a diagram of the different meanings of innovation by the three savants: Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber. We have additionally observed their hunches, sentiments and desires for advancement. Various parts of innovation and the difference in these perspectives that influence advancement have been talked about and contrasted with the pre-present day age. Nonetheless, even with all these, it should in any case be evident that there still exists no exact meaning of advancement and the term is available to any conviction that any individual could think of.

Three Topics For Christmas Essay

Three Topics For Christmas EssayWhen you get ready to write an essay for your Christmas assignment, take into consideration three topics. What kind of things are you most interested in this holiday season? This could help you write a successful and interesting essay.The first topic, you should consider is the holiday season itself. Is there anything you are particularly excited about? Do you have special wishes and desires for the coming year? These are all great things to write about when writing an essay on Christmas. Keep in mind that holiday seasons are a great way to get excited about a particular event or idea.For example, if you are most excited about a particular movie you saw, you might mention this and talk about how it will affect your experience with the movie. If you were at a party or event recently, mention how the event impacted your thoughts on the movie. This can help give you ideas on what kind of events you might want to write about in your essay.Something else yo u might consider when you are planning to write an essay on Christmas is the idea of a holiday tradition. Let's say that your family has been celebrating Christmas for many years. You might want to write about what traditions you have for the holiday and how they impact you and your family.One thing you should keep in mind is that each holiday season is unique from other. Make sure that you write about the uniqueness of each holiday season. This will help you know how to write a successful essay on Christmas.The next topic, you should consider is whether or not the holidays are meant to be an end or a beginning. Most people are thinking that the holidays are meant to be a good time to relax. However, do you feel that the holiday season is meant to be special and entertaining? This is something you should consider when you are writing an essay on Christmas.In addition, do you think the holidays are really special time? You might find that some of your family members don't agree with you. So you might want to include this topic. You might find that you can highlight certain points about the holidays that make them special and even cause you to reminisce about the past.As you can see, there are many great topics that you can use when you are writing an essay on Christmas. Start thinking about these topics now so that you will be prepared to write the essay you want on this holiday season.

Against Capital Punishment Essay - 1650 Words

Annotated Bibliography: Against Capital Punishment (Annotated Bibliography Sample) Content: Name of Author:Course:Name of Tutor:Date of Submission:Annotated Bibliography: Against Capital PunishmentIntroductionCapital punishment is an issue that has raised various social, religious and ethical issues since its inception. Different countries across the globe have since abolished the practice on the premise that it undermines human worth. Indeed, it can not be disputed that the practice has far reaching implications on not only the offender but also on the family, relatives and the entire society. It is in this regard that this paper provides a detailed annotated bibliography that underscores that counter arguments of capital punishment.Gardner, Hanks. Against Death Penalty. USA: Herald Press, 1997.The writer provides a collection of compelling arguments regarding capital punishment. He uses a host of information from both the new and Old Testament bible and argues that death penalty is inhuman. According to him, it has more detrimental than beneficial effects and does not enforce justice to all parties. He draws his arguments from various researches that ascertain that capital punishment is indeed not a deterrent measure. He therefore suggests that other measures need to be undertaken to fights crime, rather than employ the ineffective death penalty. However, this book might not benefit the segment of the population that does not believe in ideals upheld by the Christianity. Nevertheless, it provides vital arguments that capture a significant percentage of arguments provided in other sources. This makes it a viable source for students undertaking revision and for sustainable reference for professionals seeking to make timely reviews.Mark, Costanzo. Just Revenge: The Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment. USA: Worth Publishers, 1997Costanzo argues that the current trends ascertain that the effectiveness of capital punishment in the United States is largely at stake. He bases his deductions on vital data that ascertains that the number of of fenders being condemned for death penalty has increased significantly. He maintains that capital punishment is an unfair and cruel act that has failed dismally to prevent the soaring incidences of crime. He argues that in order to obtain optimal results and reduce criminal cases significantly, the criminal justice needs to replace this by life sentence without parole. He traces the history of capital punishment and underscores the purposes for which the punishment was meant for. He notes that over time, its effectiveness in preventing and curbing crime has decreased and offenders are increasingly getting immune to the implications of the same. In addition, he considers the beneficial effects of capital punishment and shows that it is comparatively cheaper than imprisonment. Generally, it presents a critical argument of the costs and benefits of the same. It can be considered a very effective book for any academic study in sociology and /or criminal justice.Russell, Adam Paul, Casse ll (eds.). Debating Capital Punishment. Congressional Quarterly Weekly, 3 (2005): 409-86.Adam and Paul present various essays that analyze different view points of the Americans regarding the death penalty. These are drawn from numerous critical sources that range from the public response and the pardoning of capital criminals, analyses of legal personnel like the judges and lawyers to the perceptions of the philosophers and the clergy regarding the issue. The contributors make a remarked evaluation of various facets of capital punishment. In particular, they critically review the sensitivity that is related to race issues, economic concerns, morality, retribution, the position of the United States in comparison with other countries, its deterrence values, and various risks involved including that of the possibility of wrong executions and the implications of the punishment to the family members and close relations. Irrespective of the fact that these contributors lay particular emp hasis on their individual view points, it is notable that they equally evaluate the relative issue of life and death. The article is considered imperative for this study because it can be employed as a single source by students pursuing criminal justice. This is because of the fact that it critically reviews all the relative aspects that are related to the issue under review. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that it fails to accredit its arguments with factual data. At this juncture, it is worth noting that this greatly undermines is objectivity in analyzing death punishment. Nonetheless, it provides useful insights that can not only be employed in academic study but can also form the basement upon which future research can be based.Stuart, Banner. The Death Penalty. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1 (2003): 77-92.The author provides a comprehensive analysis of the American perceptions of capital punishment since historical times. In addition, he provides an explicit evalu ation of the technological changes that have taken place since the institution of the punishment. Banner cites that in historical times, execution took place in public and prayers were said and sermons read before the process. Comparatively, he indicates that the modern process is characterized by significant secrecy as only few individuals are allowed to attend. He also ascertains the fact that the cruelty associated with the practice contributed significantly to its abolishment after the civil war. Its revival and enforcement, he argues, reflects the modern degree of harshness that is associated with punishment. He decries the practice and argues that in the current era, other options need to be explored. According to him, the technological advancements have provided vital options that can equally enforce the relative justice that the practice is meant to uphold. He also shows that the attitude of the US population regarding death penalty has undergone various changes. In this re spect, he indicates that a significant part of the population agree to the practice and contend that it should be enforced. In contrast the historical population considered the practice to be unfair and thus it was only employed sparingly and only in specific cases. Irrespective of the fact that its main focus is the changing attitudes of the population on death penalty, the review can be considered to be very insightful because of its in-depth analysis of the issue that it pursues.Franklin, Zimring. Controversies Surrounding American Capital Punishment. Oxford: University Press, 2004.In his analytic review, Franklin presents various controversies surrounding death penalty in America. He is provocative and poses various questions to the public regarding this sensitive issue of capital punishment. According to him, he does not approve of the practice and argues that it is a presentation of the biases that the society accords the relative offenders. In particular, he cites that in th e past, various individuals have been increasingly identified and executed for crimes that they were not responsible for. Such cases according to him are racially perpetuated and therefore prejudiced and should be shunned. He does not understand why amongst all the democracies that are established, America is the only one that pursues the practice. He contends that this can be attributed to the vigilante values that the nation upholds. In this regard, he maintains that the misinformed cultural and political forces greatly influence the enforcement of the practice. He laments that this has borne negative effects because similar ideas are being assessed on to the next generations and are likely to be more detrimental in future. In this regard, he asserts that numerous developing countries that abandoned the practice are far much better than America. Franklins analysis is a thought provoking review that stimulates critical analysis of the issue of capital punishment. Thus is not only c onsidered important for academic studies but it also forms an important basement for critical thinking for students pursuing courses related to criminal justice.Jamie, Fellner Sarah Tofte. Implications of Death Penalty in the Unites States. Human Rights Watch, 1 (2006): 1-56.The authors argue that death penalty is an inhuman activity that needs to be abolished in the United States. This is due to the relative physical and emotional pain not only to the offender but also to the relatives of the same. This is also approved by the law of the human rights watch whose prepositions suggest that until its amendment, alternative options that inflict the least pain to the offenders should be employed. This according to the authors was implemented in a bit to reduce emotional and physical suffering that he offenders go through. In particular, Jamie and Sarah argue against the use of lethal injection that is commonly employed in the United States. They back this up using factual information f rom the various states in the United States. Indeed, their findings assert that of the thirty nine states that have mainstreamed capital punishment within their law, thirty seven of them employ lethal injection in execution. Of these, the authors point out that nineteen have legalized it as the only method of execution. This has been done irrespective of the fact that the process inflicts excruciating pain in the individuals. Thus from an ethical standpoint, ...

Definition, Examples, and Observations on Writing

(1) Writing is a system of graphic symbols that can be used to convey meaning. See the observations below. Also, see the following topics related to the writing system: AlphabetGraphemicsHandwritingIdeogramLanguageLetter (2) Writing is the act of composing a text. See the observations below. Also, see the following topics related to composition: Academic WritingThe Advantages of Slow Reading and Slow WritingBasic WritingBusiness WritingCollaborative WritingComposition-RhetoricDraftingOnline WritingOverwritingPrewritingRevisionTechnical WritingWriterWriting ProcessYour Writing: Private and Public Writers on Writing Quotes About WritingWhat Is the Secret of Good Writing?What Is Writing Like? (Explaining the Writing Experience Through Similes and Metaphors)Writers on RewritingWriters on WritingWriters on Writing: Overcoming Writers Block Etymology and Pronunciation From an Indo-European root, to cut, scratch, sketch an outline Pronunciation: RI-ting Observations Writing and Language Writing is not language. Language is a complex system residing in our brain which allows us to produce and interpret utterances. Writing involves making an utterance visible. Our cultural tradition does not make this distinction clearly. We sometimes hear statements such as Hebrew has no vowels; this statement is roughly true for the Hebrew writing system, but it is definitely not true for the Hebrew language. Readers should constantly check that they are not confusing language and writing.(Henry Rogers, Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach. Blackwell, 2005) Origins of Writing Most scholars now accept that writing began with accountancy. . . . In the late 4th millennium BC, the complexity of trade and administration in Mesopotamia reached a point at which it outstripped the power of memory of the governing elite. To record transactions in a dependable, permanent form became essential... [E]ssential to the development of full writing, as opposed to the limited, purely pictographic writing of North American Indians and others, was the discovery of the rebus principle. This was the radical idea that a pictographic symbol could be used for its phonetic value. Thus a drawing of an owl in Egyptian hieroglyphs could represent a consonant sound with an inherent m; and in English a picture of a bee with a picture of a leaf might (if one were so minded) represent the word belief.(Andrew Robinson, The Story of Writing. Thames, 1995) The Literate Revolution in Ancient Greece By Aristotles time, political orators, including Demosthenes, were publishing written, polished versions of speeches they had earlier delivered. Though writing had been introduced into Greece in the ninth century [BC], publication long remained a matter of oral presentation. The period from the middle of the fifth to the middle of the fourth centuries B.C. has been called the time of a literate revolution in Greece, comparable to the changes brought in the fifteenth century by the introduction of printing and in the twentieth century by the computer, for reliance on writing greatly increased in this period and affected the perception of texts; see Havelock 1982 and Ong 1982. . . . Rhetoric gave increased attention to the study of written composition. The radical effects of greater reliance on writing can, however, be exaggerated; ancient society remained oral to a much greater degree than modern society, and the primary goal of the teaching of rhetoric was consistently an ability to speak in public. (George A. Kennedy, Aristotle, On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Oxford University Press, 1991) Plato on the Strange Quality of Writing Thamus replied [to Theuth], Now you, who are the father of letters, have been led by your affection to ascribe to them a power the opposite of that which they really possess. For this invention will produce forgetfulness in the minds of those who learn to use it, because they will not practice their memory. . . . You offer your pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they will read many things without instruction and will therefore seem to know many things, when they are for the most part ignorant. Writing, Phaedrus, has this strange quality, and is very like painting; for the creatures of painting stand like living beings, but if one asks them a question, they preserve a solemn silence. And so it is with written words; you might think they spoke as if they had intelligence, but if you question them, wishing to know about their sayings, they always say only one and the same thing. And every word, when once it is written, is bandied about, alike among those who understand and those who have no interest in it, and it knows not to whom to speak or not to speak; when ill-treated or unjustly reviled it always needs its father to help it; for it has no power to protect or help itself.(Socrates in Platos Phaedrus, translated by H. N. Fowler) Further Reflections on Writing Writing is like a drug, too often employed by quacks who dont know what is true and what is false. Like a drug, writing is both a poison and a medicine, but only a real doctor knows its nature and the proper disposition of its power.(Denis Donoghue, Ferocious Alphabets. Columbia University Press, 1981)Writing is not a game played according to rules. Writing is a compulsive, and delectable thing. Writing is its own reward.(Henry Miller, Henry Miller on Writing. New Directions, 1964)Writing is really a way of thinking--not just feeling but thinking about things that are disparate, unresolved, mysterious, problematic or just sweet.(Toni Morrison, quoted by Sybil Steinberg in Writing for Your Life. Pushcart, 1992)Writing is more than anything a compulsion, like some people wash their hands thirty times a day for fear of awful consequences if they do not. It pays a whole lot better than this type of compulsion, but it is no more heroic.(Julie Burchill, Sex and Sensibility, 1992)It is nece ssary to write, if the days are not to slip emptily by. How else, indeed, to clap the net over the butterfly of the moment? for the moment passes, it is forgotten; the mood is gone; life itself is gone. That is where the writer scores over his fellows; he catches the changes of his mind on the hop.(Vita Sackville-West, Twelve Days, 1928)You most likely need a thesaurus, a rudimentary grammar book, and a grip on reality. This latter means: theres no free lunch. Writing is work. Its also gambling. You dont get a pension plan. Other people can help you a bit, but  ­essentially youre on your own.  ­Nobody is making you do this: you chose it, so dont whine.(Margaret Atwood, Rules for Writers. The Guardian, February 22, 2010)Why one writes is a question I can answer easily, having so often asked it myself. I believe one writes because one has to create a world in which one can live. I could not live in any of the worlds offered to me--the world of my parents, the world of war, the wor ld of politics. I had to create a world of my own, like a climate, a country, an atmosphere where I could breathe, reign, and recreate myself when destroyed by living. That, I believe, is the reason for every work of art. We also write to heighten our awareness of life. We write to lure, enchant, and to console others. We write to serenade. We write to taste life twice, once in the moment and once in retrospection. We write to be able to transcend our life, to reach beyond it. We write to teach ourselves to speak to others, to record the journey into the labyrinth. We write to expand our world when we feel strangled or restricted or lonely.(Anaà ¯s Nin, The New Woman. In Favor of the Sensitive Man and Other Essays. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976) The Lighter Side of Writing Writing is like the worlds oldest profession. First, you do it for your own enjoyment. Then you do it for a few friends. Eventually, you figure, what the hell, I might as well get paid for it.(Television scriptwriter Irma Kalish)